While every class will have bright children, there is a distinct difference between a bright student and a gifted or high ability one. Not all children will display these characteristics, but they will exhibit some. The following list shows the subtle distinctions between these two quite similar children.
| Bright Child | Gifted Child |
|---|---|
| Knows the answers | Asks the questions |
| Interested | Extremely curious |
| Pays attention | Gets involved physically and mentally |
| Works hard | Plays around, still gets good test scores |
| Answers the questions | Questions the answers |
| Enjoys same-age peers | Prefers adults or older children |
| Good at memorisation | Good at guessing |
| Learns easily | Bored. Already knew the answers |
| Listens well | Shows strong feelings and opinions |
| Self Satisfied | Highly critical of self (perfectionism) |
Szabos (http://www.tagfam.org/whoisgifted.html)
This table however only provides a fleeting glimpse of a gifted child. General behavioural, learning and creativity characteristics offer a more three-dimensional conception of giftedness (ERIC Clearinghouse, 1985). Once again the traits highlighted in each checklist are not representative of every high ability child. You may find yourself identifying with only one or two items in each case. The checklists do however provide a starting point to identifying gifted children across the age ranges.
The behaviour of gifted children will differ from that of their peers in the following ways:
Gifted children are natural learners who often show many of these characteristics.
Creativity is often what separates gifted children from their peers.
Here are some more characteristics of gifted children (Clark, 1988). These are typical factors stressed by educational authorities as being indicative of giftedness. Obviously, no child is outstanding in all characteristics.
These lists provide preliminary guidelines, which should have a suspicious teacher or parent nodding their head. Identification using list methods alone is hazardous and difficult to relate to a real, live individual. For this reason it is worthwhile looking at the gifted Types put forward by George Betts and Maureen Neihart in 1988. Their research found recurring traits and responses, which led them to deduce six types of gifted individuals. They developed six profiles of gifted and talented individuals and explain how each profile copes in the traditional learning environment.
The vast majority of gifted children will exhibit behaviours resembling those from the Successful group. These children have learned to use school and the education system to their own advantage. They recognise what is expected of them from their parents and teachers and display behaviour in accordance. They encounter few learning problems and perform well on achievement tests. This group don’t tend to display behavioural problems as they are keen for parent and teacher approval.
Type I’s habitually struggle to take charge of their own learning and so are rarely intrinsically motivated to pursue their own interest areas. They have a tendency to coast along in school, applying energy only when necessary. Many depend on their teachers and indeed parents for structure and focus, and therefore greatly rely on extrinsic motivation. This negatively impacts on their overall development, as the constant affirmation leads to a personal ignorance of their deficiencies. These children will nevertheless achieve, but ultimately they will not reach their potential as they have never managed to fully extend their creativity or become independent learners.
Gifted underachievers generally come from this group. Having never fully acquired the competency or mindset critical to autonomous learning and development, they are eventually tested by the challenges of adapting to life’s changes. From an educational perspective, children from the Successful group are easily identifiable as gifted. According to the authors they make up 90% of students on gifted programmes.
Children from this group are less recognisable as gifted individuals as they exhibit perceivably negative behaviours. They often struggle to have their abilities recognised and become frustrated when they are not. Coping with an education system that does not fit easily with their talents causes much stress. Unlike the Successful group, they find difficulty using the system to their advantage. Although highly creative, these children are very often thwarted by a system that does not properly cater or applaud their talents. In class they are notably rebellious, challenging authority and often questioning their teacher in front of the class. Children in this group are observed as stubborn, inconsiderate and cynical individuals.
Type II’s also struggle with their self-esteem and may or may not feel part of their social group. Some Type II’s challenge other children and as a result find themselves isolated or excluded from their peer group. Others gain popularity through their appealing sense of humour and their creativity. The Challenging very often have a negative self-concept.
Children in this group are believed to be at risk as “eventual dropouts for drug addiction or delinquent behaviour if appropriate interventions are not made.” While not scientifically proven to be the case, parents of students who dropped out of school remarked that they witnessed Type II behaviours in their children earlier on.
Although it is not uncommon for males to become part of the “underground gifted,” gifted children that fall into this grouping are typically female aged between 11 and 13 years. A girls desire to ‘fit in’ becomes greatest during these years and in this bid to integrate into their social circle they are willing to conceal their advanced academic ability. Girls in this age group are often seen to undergo “sudden radical transformation” in variance with the expectations of their teachers and parents. While the natural reaction is to persist with the child to get back on track, this usually rectifies itself in time. The child will feel torn during this time as they are denying their true selves in favour of social acceptance. As a result of this children belonging to this group very often feel insecure, uneasy and restless. Alternative approaches and applications should be put in place during this period to ensure that their academic needs are being met, all but in a modified fashion.
Although this phenomenon is more evident amongst females, it is the case for some males, although generally when they are older (between the ages of 14 and 17 years) and interestingly in response to social pressures to undertake athletic activities.
Children from this group have developed very negative impressions of school and education stemming from feelings of isolation, not fitting in and not having their abilities recognised. They are angry that the educational system has not met their needs and they harbour feelings of rejection. School is perceived as a hostile environment. They tend to be defensive in manner and act out their anger by appearing depressed. Typically their interests lie outside of the school curriculum and therefore make it harder for them to receive praise, acknowledgement or any form of reward. Gifted individuals in their teenager years usually fall into this group. Because of this there is a danger that their reactions may be mistaken for the trappings of puberty rather than the natural reaction to the aforementioned sentiments.
Typically these students are not identified early enough, affording them time to develop negative, resentful attitudes. By this stage they also have developed low self-esteem.
Children who have physical, emotional or learning difficulties, along with high academic ability are Type V students. Very often these impediments hinder their identification and so differentiated programmes are not made available to them. Identification of dually exceptional children is becoming more prevalent, although their high ability is normally only revealed fortuitously as a result of investigating their discernible difficulties.
For these reasons identification of dual exceptionality can quite often be tricky.
“They may have sloppy handwriting or disruptive behaviours that make it difficult for them to complete work, and they often seem confused about their inability to perform school tasks. They show symptoms of stress; they may feel discouraged, frustrated, rejected, helpless or isolated.” (Betts & Niehart, 1988)
With low self-esteem, these children are unlikely to admit defeat and enlist assistance; rather they will complain that activities are “boring” or “pointless.” They may humiliate other children in an attempt to boost their own self-worth. They harbour feelings of unmet expectations and react negatively to any form of criticism. They have a tendency to intellectualise even simple things as a means of managing their own feelings of insufficiency. Usually children in this group have only their weaknesses concentrated on, with a failure to acknowledge or nurture their hidden aptitudes.
Gifted children that fall into this group quickly developed autonomy at school. Using the system to their own advantage, unlike Type I children, they know how to use it to create new opportunities for themselves. They receive positive responses from parents and teachers for both their achievements but also for who they are. Individuals from this group have positive self-concepts as their educational needs are being met, albeit through their own actions. They believe in themselves, which allows them to take risks. They are successful individuals, with many going on to work in leadership roles.
Gifted individuals falling into this category show strong control and ownership over their own personal and educational ambitions. They do not rely on others for the fulfilment of their objectives.